【经典案例】美国著名 “甜点抗辩” 案：爱吃零食真能为杀人脱罪？-行业资讯-海望老师

People of the State of California v. Daniel James white

[争议内容] Dan White’s attorneys used his shift to a poor diet as one piece of evidence illustrating mental deterioration: a symptom of depression, not an explanation for violence.

第一段：案件背景与当事人
本案是加利福尼亚州历史上最具争议的刑事案件之一。被告丹尼尔·詹姆斯·怀特曾任旧金山市监事会成员。1978年11月10日，怀特辞去职务；数日后他请求复职，市长乔治·莫斯康起初表示愿意重新任命，但随后致信怀特称并未作出任何复职承诺。监事哈维·米尔克则公开反对怀特复职。1978年11月26日晚，一名记者告知怀特他将不会获得复职。

Paragraph 1: Case Background and Parties
This case is one of the most controversial criminal trials in California history. Defendant Daniel James White had served as a member of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. On November 10, 1978, White resigned; days later he sought reappointment. Mayor George Moscone initially indicated he would reappoint White, but later sent White a letter saying no such commitment had been made. Supervisor Harvey Milk publicly opposed White’s reinstatement. On the evening of November 26, 1978, a reporter informed White that he would not be reappointed.

第二段：双重谋杀案的发生
1978年11月27日上午，怀特携带一把装有半被甲.38口径子弹的左轮手枪前往市政厅。为避开金属探测器，他从地下室窗户潜入。上午10时40分，怀特进入市长办公室，短暂交谈后向莫斯康市长开枪四次：两枪击中身体，两枪在市长倒地失去能力后从约一英尺处击中头部。随后怀特重新装弹，前往哈维·米尔克的办公室，将米尔克射杀五次：三枪击中身体，两枪在米尔克倒地后击中后脑。当天晚些时候，怀特向警方自首。

Paragraph 2: The Double Murders
On the morning of November 27, 1978, White carried a .38-caliber revolver loaded with semi-jacketed bullets to City Hall. To avoid metal detectors, he entered through a basement window. At approximately 10:40 a.m., White entered the mayor’s office and, after a brief conversation, shot Mayor Moscone four times：twice in the body and twice in the head from about one foot away after the mayor had fallen incapacitated. White then reloaded, went to Harvey Milk’s office, and shot Milk five times：three times in the body and twice in the back of the head after Milk had fallen. Later that day, White surrendered to police.

第三段：审判与“甜点抗辩”
怀特被控两项一级谋杀罪。庭审中，辩护方提出“能力减弱”辩护，声称怀特长期患有未经治疗的抑郁症，案发时缺乏预谋和蓄意所必需的心理能力。多名精神科专家作证称怀特在作案时不具备深思熟虑、预谋、恶意或形成犯罪意图的能力。其中一位医生提到，怀特在案发前放弃了健康饮食，转而大量摄入Twinkies、HoHos和可乐等甜食，这些被描述为抑郁症的症状而非原因。媒体将此证词简化为“甜点抗辩”，但辩护方从未主张怀特因吃甜食而中毒或失控。

Paragraph 3: Trial and the “Twinkie Defense”
White was charged with two counts of firstdegree murder. At trial, the defense presented a diminished capacity argument, claiming White suffered from untreated depression and lacked the mental capacity for premeditation and deliberation at the time of the killings. Several psychiatrists testified that White did not possess the ability to deliberate, premeditate, act with malice, or form criminal intent. One psychiatrist noted that White had abandoned his healthy diet and consumed large amounts of Twinkies, HoHos, and sugary sodas—described as symptoms of depression, not causes. The media dubbed this the “Twinkie defense,” but the defense never argued that White was intoxicated or out of control due to eating sweets.

第四段：判决与上诉
陪审团认定怀特犯有两项自愿过失杀人罪（一级谋杀罪的较轻包含罪）。法官判处怀特总计七年零八个月监禁：第一项罪名处四年最高刑期加两年枪支加重刑，第二项罪名处一年连续刑期加八个月枪支加重刑。怀特就量刑提起上诉。1981年3月25日，加州上诉法院第一上诉区第二分庭作出裁决，认定初审法院量刑并无不当，维持原判定罪和刑罚。

Paragraph 4: Verdict and Appeal
The jury found White guilty of two counts of voluntary manslaughter, a lesser included offense of firstdegree murder. The judge sentenced White to a total of seven years and eight months in prison: four years’ maximum plus two years for gun enhancement on the first count, and one consecutive year plus eight months’ gun enhancement on the second count. White appealed his sentence. On March 25, 1981, the California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Two, ruled that the trial court had not erred in sentencing and affirmed both the convictions and the sentence.

第五段：案件影响与遗产
该判决引发旧金山“白夜暴动”，抗议者对怀特仅获过失杀人罪定罪极为愤怒。此案直接推动加州立法机构废除了“能力减弱”刑事辩护。怀特在索莱达州立监狱服刑五年后，于1984年1月6日获得假释。1985年10月21日，怀特自杀身亡。“甜点抗辩”一词自此成为美国法律文化中一个持久且富有争议的符号，尽管其实际审判内容与大众认知存在显著差异。

Paragraph 5: Impact and Legacy
The verdict triggered the “White Night” riots in San Francisco, as protesters were outraged that White received only manslaughter convictions. The case directly led the California legislature to abolish the diminished capacity defense in criminal trials. After serving five years at Soledad State Prison, White was paroled on January 6, 1984. On October 21, 1985, White died by suicide. The term “Twinkie defense” has since become an enduring and controversial symbol in American legal culture, though the actual trial testimony differed significantly from public perception.

团队介绍

海望老师Ⓡ是中国首家国际律师培养整体解决方案供应商，专注为华语法律学子、执业律师及法务人才，提供从LSAT考试、法学院申请、海外执业资格到国际化职业发展的全链条一站式服务，助力学员成长为具备全球视野与执业能力的高端涉外法治人才。

核心业务

1、LSAT考试培训

海望老师从2011年开始从事LSAT教学研究工作，是国内较早系统从事LSAT教学研究的专家之一。LSAT团队主讲教师均为大学在职法学教师或国际执业律师，课程覆盖大一到大四各阶段，帮助学生早做准备、系统备考。

2、美国法学院申请指导

海望老师申请团队覆盖美国 T14 及英、港、新、澳等顶尖院校，提供 JD/LLM/SJD 申请规划、文书指导、背景提升、面试陪跑等全流程服务。十余年来已培养出大量赴美攻读法律职业博士（JD）学位的学生，学员几乎覆盖美国前50名所有法学院。

3、海外执业资格备考

主攻美国加州律考（CA Bar）、纽约律考、香港 OLQE 等主流资格考试，紧跟政策改革，提供考点精讲、真题模考、答疑督学，助力高效通关。

核心优势

1、体系化培养：从考试、申请到执业、就业，覆盖法律人国际化发展全周期，一站式解决备考、升学、取证、就业难题。

2、专业化师资：团队由海内外法学院在职教授、LSAT高分导师、持证律师构成，深耕法律教育与涉外实务，教学与实战并重。

3、精细化服务：采用保姆式、陪跑式教学，提供定制化方案、全程督学、面试指导、担保函支持，全程护航学员成长。

4、全球化资源：链接全球顶尖法学院、精品律所与跨国企业，搭建学术与职业桥梁，助力学员进入国际法律职场。